Where can I find DC++k ?
Moderator: Moderators
-
Sergiu
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 2003-05-13 20:23
Where can I find DC++k ?
I'm looking for latest version of this proggy: DC++k. Any idea ?
-
TheParanoidOne
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 1420
- Joined: 2003-04-22 19:37
-
jtav69
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 2003-01-13 22:50
Re: Where can I find DC++k ?
Sergiu wrote:I'm looking for latest version of this proggy: DC++k. Any idea ?
effin lamer, that's a lamers tool.
-
sarf
- Posts: 382
- Joined: 2003-01-24 10:43
- Location: Sweden
Re: why do you
I don't know exactly why it's allowed, but it might be due to me being a kind and nice person, or it might be because it kinda helps people with the infamous "maxing upload means less download" problem, as well as containing some small fixes for other problems. <-- shameless plug.
But I don't know, maybe it is because I am arnetheduck's evil twin - who knows?
Sarf
---
In this world, truth can wait; she's used to it.
But I don't know, maybe it is because I am arnetheduck's evil twin - who knows?
Sarf
---
In this world, truth can wait; she's used to it.
-
OLDoMiNiON
- Posts: 202
- Joined: 2003-01-06 11:22
- Location: Salford, England.
-
sarf
- Posts: 382
- Joined: 2003-01-24 10:43
- Location: Sweden
OLDoMiNiON wrote:I'm curious sarf. Why did you get rid of the useful OP-like tools in DC++k?
Well... some of them was incorporated (well, kinda...) into DC++ (custom commands), and the others were quite instable (not to mention a pain in the neck to add back into DC++ all the time). Also, there are people which are working on tools that do the same thing as DC++k did before - I'll probably snatch the code from then and tinker a bit with it when they are done. That way I can hopefully get a more stable version of the "OP-tools". Something I have been thinking about is an automated filelist/share size checker, but that's still on the drawing board.
Sarf
---
If at first you don't suceed, skydiving is not for you!
-
OLDoMiNiON
- Posts: 202
- Joined: 2003-01-06 11:22
- Location: Salford, England.
-
XmothX
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 2003-06-18 18:29
just a thought
unfortunatley Sergiu
jtav is right, many of us hubowners agree
although. DC++K is saving face a little, by binding the ups and downs together, i would still kick and ban you out of our hubs if you got caught using such tools.
the original DC++ should stay as it is.
jtav is right, many of us hubowners agree
although. DC++K is saving face a little, by binding the ups and downs together, i would still kick and ban you out of our hubs if you got caught using such tools.
the original DC++ should stay as it is.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests