Operation Digital Gridlock

Drop a note here when you delete a post and so on so we can keep track of troublemakers...

Moderator: Moderators

Xan1977
Forum Moderator
Posts: 627
Joined: 2003-06-06 01:15

Operation Digital Gridlock

Post by Xan1977 » 2004-08-25 23:38

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jh ... ction=news
or
http://tinyurl.com/3taqk

Targeted in the raids were people operating "hubs" in a file-sharing network based on Direct Connect software.


However, no arrests were made.
Last edited by Xan1977 on 2004-08-26 03:30, edited 2 times in total.

Punkishlyevil
Posts: 25
Joined: 2004-02-27 03:14
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Post by Punkishlyevil » 2004-08-26 03:05

I just saw that a few minutes ago. Are they going after all Operators, or just the ones running the software though?

Xan1977
Forum Moderator
Posts: 627
Joined: 2003-06-06 01:15

Post by Xan1977 » 2004-08-26 03:26

--
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2004/August/04_ag_578.htm
UDGNET was the primary target.
--

Punkishlyevil wrote:Are they going after all Operators, or just the ones running the software though/

The warrants were for the hubowners only.

Xan1977
Forum Moderator
Posts: 627
Joined: 2003-06-06 01:15

Post by Xan1977 » 2004-08-26 03:49

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/08/25 ... letraders/
The Register weighs in. I like their take on the matter.

Punkishlyevil
Posts: 25
Joined: 2004-02-27 03:14
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Post by Punkishlyevil » 2004-08-26 04:39

All this shit is making me scared to even run a hub that allows live legal music because knowing these people, they will do anything to win.

Todi
Forum Moderator
Posts: 699
Joined: 2003-03-04 17:16

Post by Todi » 2004-08-26 06:57

The individuals involved in the search warrants operate some of the Underground Network's hubs, which act as a central point for people granted membership to exchange copyrighted files. Ashcroft said the hubs can store digital data each day equivalent to 60,000 full-length movies or 10 million songs.


It's clear he's really studied the matter closely. Quick hubowners, hide your WMD right away before Bush starts a war against us! (wops, i forgot, we don't have any... ah well, that's never stopped him before)

Punkishlyevil
Posts: 25
Joined: 2004-02-27 03:14
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Post by Punkishlyevil » 2004-08-26 07:22

Also, I don't think any hubs have 40 PB not. 40 TB is not uncommon, but really, what hub (let alone 5 of them) have 40 PBs. :roll:

jerryseinfeld
Posts: 2
Joined: 2004-08-10 19:48

Post by jerryseinfeld » 2004-08-27 13:50

http://www.c-span.org/Search/basic.asp?BasicQueryText=ashcroft&SortBy=date
http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/speeches/2004/82504ag.htm
"Operation Digital Gridlock is targeting illegal file trafficking of copyrighted material over peer-to-peer networks using Direct Connect software."
"On these 5 networks alone, more than 40 terabytes of material was available to be distributed and trafficked by the users on any given day."
"You can pay the fair value for music, movies, software and games like every other consumer, or you can pay an even higher price when you are caught committing online theft."

As anyone would know, some hubs currently share ten times those 40TiB and some more than 600TiB. But that's not the point. The point is to understand what they say. That law enforcement is picking up on the "smaller" networks and that they're going to make it hurt.

Maybe they'll go after torrent soon and send some big bills to the torrent sites and the trackers. Question is if any of these computers are still onshore.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests