more = better?...

Drop a note here when you delete a post and so on so we can keep track of troublemakers...

Moderator: Moderators

acidflair
Posts: 34
Joined: 2004-02-22 19:48

more = better?...

Post by acidflair » 2004-03-10 22:56

hey guys, would u's say that in the world of DC++, do you think that more = better?...
i mean, i f i have 100gb, and i go in a room with 100gb share, so u think this would be better than a 5gb for instance?..also, due to this, would the downoads be faster?...
i know it sounds like a stoopid/silly/obvious question....but i just wondered if this was the case?...
would kinda gimme something to work to ;)..hehe...


AF

TheParanoidOne
Forum Moderator
Posts: 1420
Joined: 2003-04-22 19:37

Re: more = better?...

Post by TheParanoidOne » 2004-03-10 23:05

acidflair wrote:also, due to this, would the downoads be faster?...

Volume of data available has no correlation to the data rate of transmission.
The world is coming to an end. Please log off.

DC++ Guide | Words

acidflair
Posts: 34
Joined: 2004-02-22 19:48

Post by acidflair » 2004-03-10 23:09

i see, but what i kinda meant was, would the downlads be faster because of the people ur downloading off, are they more reliable, or just as 'trustworthy', for lack of a better word, as the people in the 5gb rooms...
i dont know if u'll understand..


AF

Gasman1015
Posts: 184
Joined: 2003-05-26 16:29
Location: UK

Re: more = better?...

Post by Gasman1015 » 2004-03-10 23:31

TheParanoidOne wrote:
acidflair wrote:also, due to this, would the downoads be faster?...

Volume of data available has no correlation to the data rate of transmission.


Technically correct, but if volume of data is in abundance then you are able to chose a faster connection for your particular download. :wink:
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.

acidflair
Posts: 34
Joined: 2004-02-22 19:48

Post by acidflair » 2004-03-10 23:49

i think thats what i was asking gasman, thanx...


AF

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests