Archived discussion about features (predating the use of Bugzilla as a bug and feature tracker)
Moderator: Moderators
-
majinsoftware
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 2003-09-08 07:53
- Location: NZ
Post
by majinsoftware » 2003-09-08 07:59
I think that you should only be able to download/upload at then speed that is shown on you connecton speed.
That will teach the A$$s on T3 that desplay there connection as 56.6K
Thanks

-
theburger
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 2003-07-11 14:27
Post
by theburger » 2003-09-08 13:03
I have a strange feelin everyone would have selected T3 then

-
Twink
- Posts: 436
- Joined: 2003-04-01 04:31
- Location: New Zealand
Post
by Twink » 2003-09-09 05:24
if you look back in the forum a bit, you would notice that its already been discussed that the current way of showing bw isn't ideal. there really isn't enough to choose from, and dsl can mean anything from like 128kbit to 8mbit.
-
TheNOP
- Posts: 275
- Joined: 2003-07-08 02:41
- Location: Quebec
Post
by TheNOP » 2003-09-09 05:33
mmm a feature to turn a 56K connection into a T3
this with the minds controled interface feature i saw not long ago would be really cool.

TheNOP
Have you read the
FAQ?
Or the sticky ? It might give you idea.
-
Twink
- Posts: 436
- Joined: 2003-04-01 04:31
- Location: New Zealand
Post
by Twink » 2003-09-09 08:39
the pyschic features would work better with the instant transfer feature suggested in some thread about 'the best p2p app'
-
TheParanoidOne
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 1420
- Joined: 2003-04-22 19:37
Post
by TheParanoidOne » 2003-09-09 12:00
So basically we want a program that transfers files instantly the moment we think about them. Right?
Seems fairly simple to implement ...

-
GargoyleMT
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-08 02:46
- Location: .pa.us
Post
by GargoyleMT » 2003-09-09 17:47
TheParanoidOne wrote:Seems fairly simple to implement ...

It's trivial, actually. I've been programming since the birth of Jesus. Well, actually, I invented the computers,
then I programmed them. However, recently, I've been into other things, like managing companies and sowing discontent. Perhaps one of you lesser beings can do this trivial piece of coding for me?
kthxplsbye.
-
barffy-man
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 2003-08-25 00:03
Post
by barffy-man » 2003-09-12 02:08
It seems pointless to ask for this kind of feature. The code is open source, and anyone could just cut that code out, making it pointless. This board is more for features to make dc++ interface/protocol better (at least I assume it is).
-
Twink
- Posts: 436
- Joined: 2003-04-01 04:31
- Location: New Zealand
Post
by Twink » 2003-09-12 03:33
barffy-man wrote:It seems pointless to ask for this kind of feature. The code is open source, and anyone could just cut that code out, making it pointless. This board is more for features to make dc++ interface/protocol better (at least I assume it is).
its alot easier to change a dropdown box then to learn how to compile dc++, and I doubt most people would care enough about their real connection displaying to learn
-
GargoyleMT
- DC++ Contributor
- Posts: 3212
- Joined: 2003-01-08 02:46
- Location: .pa.us
Post
by GargoyleMT » 2003-09-12 16:37
But those people who want to discourage downloads from them certainly would be motivated moreso than normal users. This can be done with my throttling code and some tying into the dropdown in the General settings. However, Arne doesn't like throttling code, so it won't (very likely) become a part of DC++ any time soon, even if only to limit to the speeds set in the connection box... (the only viable option, really, is limiting to 56k and ISDN speeds if they pick those - DSL and cable vary too widely to pick one number)... Then the abusers will just pick the next speed up.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests