0.402 info(tth leaf transfers and no bz2list support)

Post by **arnetheduck** » 2004-05-23 19:03

Ok, for those interested, the next version will support tth leaf transfers using an adc-like command, you can look in the cvs for details...

Oh, and bz2-filelist support has been dropped in favor for xml.bz2...remember, no free slots given for nmdc-style .dclst filelists, not even for op's if I remember things correctly...

Guitarm · Post by **Guitarm** » 2004-05-23 21:01

Ah, great to hear from you Arnie, Thanks for the info!

Regards

Harhs · Post by **Harhs** » 2004-05-25 20:23

So what will this ADC and DC++ v. 0.402 mean regarding the compatibility with other clients and the DC protocol in general? Will it be fully "transparent" so that things work as before?

Post by **GargoyleMT** » 2004-05-25 20:45

Harhs wrote:Will it be fully "transparent" so that things work as before?

No, it's not fully transparent because the option to refresh the user list is gone.

PseudonympH · Post by **PseudonympH** » 2004-05-26 01:14

Ahh... can't wait to get reported to ops for having DC++ and not having open slots for the file list

Still sounds great though; more reasons for people to upgrade to TTH-capable clients.

Naga · Post by **Naga** » 2004-05-26 06:55

I've already been baned for life one time because I was using DC++ 0.402 (Or rather the CVS version). "you are using a client with nonstandard supports....". Think I'll see what happens when 0.402 get released, it's going to be interesting

vellu · Post by **vellu** » 2004-05-26 07:56

Naga wrote:Think I'll see what happens when 0.402 get released, it's going to be interesting

Indeed, the CDM's and other op-modded clients are going to be plenty confused when 402 hits the playing fields...Atleast for a while.

joakim_tosteberg · Post by **joakim_tosteberg** » 2004-05-26 14:48

Naga wrote:I've already been baned for life one time because I was using DC++ 0.402 (Or rather the CVS version). "you are using a client with nonstandard supports....".

You're not alone

TheParanoidOne · Post by **TheParanoidOne** » 2004-05-26 16:03

joakim_tosteberg wrote:
Naga wrote:I've already been baned for life one time because I was using DC++ 0.402 (Or rather the CVS version). "you are using a client with nonstandard supports....".
You're not alone

Not by a long shot. Anything which doesn't conform is automatically "bad" as far as some people are concerned. :sigh:

Harhs · Post by **Harhs** » 2004-05-27 17:35

The new DC++ just needs to be compatible enough, so that searches, file list transfers and file transfers work like before with other Direct Connect clients, too. This is my main concern.

TheParanoidOne · Post by **TheParanoidOne** » 2004-05-27 18:32

Harhs wrote:The new DC++ just needs to be compatible enough, so that searches, file list transfers and file transfers work like before with other Direct Connect clients, too. This is my main concern.

As far as I can tell, the core has been split into NMDC stuff and ADC stuff. There should therefore be no loss in functionality with existing hubs.

Gargol · Post by **Gargol** » 2004-06-12 05:20

joakim_tosteberg wrote:
Naga wrote:I've already been baned for life one time because I was using DC++ 0.402 (Or rather the CVS version). "you are using a client with nonstandard supports....".
You're not alone

The big problem was dc++k CDM out at the moment belived DC++ cvs 402 to be BCDC and thats why many OPs banned it.
Fixed in dc++k CDM 3.0
version 3.1 fixes no fillist. (Last version of dc++k CDM)

Post by **GargoyleMT** » 2004-06-13 14:01

Gargol wrote:The big problem was dc++k CDM out at the moment belived DC++ cvs 402 to be BCDC and thats why many OPs banned it.
Fixed in dc++k CDM 3.0
version 3.1 fixes no fillist. (Last version of dc++k CDM)

CDMs have their place, but this is a prime example of their shortcomings.

PPK · Post by **PPK** » 2004-06-14 18:06

Gargol wrote:version 3.1 fixes no fillist. (Last version of dc++k CDM)

Fix without testing => not fixed and 3.1 always kicking people for DC++ without slot for filelist :lol:

psf8500 · Post by **psf8500** » 2004-06-14 23:02

PPK wrote:Fix without testing => not fixed and 3.1 always kicking people for DC++ without slot for filelist

erm. yeh it was tested. 3.1 will not consider a DC++ client without "BZList" in it's supports to be cheating if it does not give a slot for file list...

DC++k CDM 3.1 wrote:else if( (d->isSet(Download::FLAG_USER_LIST)) && (client->getOp()) && (user->isSet(User::DCPLUSPLUS))
&& (user->getSupports().find("BZList") != string::npos) && (client->getClientFavNoSlotsDcpp()) ) {
// some code to deal with people who don't give a slot for filelist...
}

Maybe there using an older version....

PPK · Post by **PPK** » 2004-06-15 02:36

Bad testing, if client have XmlBZList supports is kicked and DC++ have it from 0.307 :lol:

&& (user->getSupports().find("BZList") != string::npos) && // <= BUG

This work better :wink:

else if( (d->isSet(Download::FLAG_USER_LIST)) && (client->getOp()) && (user->isSet(User::DCPLUSPLUS))
&& (aSource->isSet(UserConnection::FLAG_SUPPORTS_BZLIST)) && (client->getClientFavNoSlotsDcpp()) )
{

psf8500 · Post by **psf8500** » 2004-06-15 06:04

OK. Point taken. Maybe some more testing was needed (losing interest in DC++k CDM now).
I'll fix it.

norti · Post by **norti** » 2004-06-18 13:35

garg:

Code: Select all

* Removed full-row-select option

Why?

PseudonympH · Post by **PseudonympH** » 2004-06-18 16:15

Because you touch yourself at night.

joakim_tosteberg · Post by **joakim_tosteberg** » 2004-06-18 17:04

PseudonympH wrote:Because you touch yourself at night.

lol, this thread is beginnning to go oftopic I think but I'll let it be left to see if anything more intressting happens

Post by **GargoyleMT** » 2004-06-19 03:18

norti wrote:Why?

Should I read that as a serious question, or as sarcasm? I'll bet you saw the other thread on the subject.

norti · Post by **norti** » 2004-06-19 15:45

GargoyleMT wrote:
norti wrote:Why?

Should I read that as a serious question, or as sarcasm? I'll bet you saw the other thread on the subject.

Haven't seen anything yet :roll:

Is there another 0.402 topic, I wasn't reading this forum for weeks

Sarcasm of course

but I'd be interested why it was removed? I always turn it on if it is supported in software

PseudonympH: no comment...

Sedulus · Post by **Sedulus** » 2004-06-20 18:10

er.. the option is removed, the functionality is not
it's now enabled wether you like it or not

Post by **GargoyleMT** » 2004-06-22 00:24

norti wrote:Is there another 0.402 topic, I wasn't reading this forum for weeks Sarcasm of course but I'd be interested why it was removed

The previous thread:
http://dcplusplus.sourceforge.net/forum ... hp?t=10867

norti · Post by **norti** » 2004-06-22 21:04

Thx

One note: I don't think "Current CVS version" name for a topic would be good for future reading, say in 6 months

DD

And I think "0.402 info..." would fit better to these questions. But that's my opinion

TheParanoidOne · Post by **TheParanoidOne** » 2004-06-22 22:13

norti wrote:I don't think "Current CVS version" name for a topic would be good for future reading, say in 6 months DD

Heh. Unfortunately people don't think in that way. That would require them to actually think about how what they do affects others.

0.402 info(tth leaf transfers and no bz2list support)

0.402 info(tth leaf transfers and no bz2list support)

Who is online