Metadata extension

Ideas for ADC may be presented here for others to review and point out flaws or further improve the idea.
Forum rules
If you have an account on the wiki, remember to update the ADC Proposals page for new ideas.

http://dcbase.org/wiki/ADC_Proposals_list
Toast

Re: Metadata extension

Post by Toast » Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:35 pm

nice find big muscle less messy and legit gaylink doest have all the answers they mostly copy shit

OCTAGRAM
Junior Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:25 am
Location: Barnaul, Russia

Re: Metadata extension

Post by OCTAGRAM » Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:38 pm

FlyLink attaches metadata into a filelist xml extra attributes. FlyLink provides less information compared to Shareaza and GreyLink. No artist, no album, just bitrate and resolution.

Big Muscle
Junior Member
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:27 pm

Re: Metadata extension

Post by Big Muscle » Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:49 pm

Please, stop talking about GL here. Nobody is interested in it. It's not important what information it returns. Important thing is how everything is implemented and FlyLink source can be good guide for it.

OCTAGRAM
Junior Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:25 am
Location: Barnaul, Russia

Re: Metadata extension

Post by OCTAGRAM » Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:59 pm

All of them 3 use MediaInfo.dll. MediaInfo.dll can be updated independently of main executable.

poy
Member
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:04 pm

Re: Metadata extension

Post by poy » Sun Aug 14, 2011 9:23 pm

here are links to previous discussions that occured in the DC++ tracker:
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/dcplusplus/+bug/211753>
<https://blueprints.launchpad.net/dcplus ... +-metadata>
<https://blueprints.launchpad.net/dcplus ... -file-list>

regarding escaping "/", how about "//" (2 slashes)? that is what user commands use, so it would provide some sort of consistency from one extension to the other.

about the 2 mentioned programs that seem to have already designed their own extension to the protocol without consulting or informing anyone here, i consider them both equally useless in the purpose of this discussion. reverse-engineering their implementation and trying to be compatible with it wouldn't allow us to strive for the best possible extension.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google (Crawler) and 0 guests